By Professor
Jean-Emmanuel PONDI
Never in the
modern history of popular emancipation has not going to school been used as a
winning strategy to attain the full emancipation of a people. Let us be clear
from the onset. As I acknowledged in a reflection published as early as
December 22nd, 2016 – for a crisis which started on November 21st 2016-, many
of the claims voiced by our Anglophone compatriots were and remain both
understandable and valid.
Indeed, more
respect is due for the constitutionally-derived linguistic provisions, by
turning into daily practice the notion of equality of status between English
and French – in that order in our fundamental text. The same holds true for the
necessity to secure free and open access to meritorious Anglophones at all
levels of the high decision-making circles of the public and private domains of
the State. In the same vain, greater attention should certainly be paid to the
uniqueness of the historical path that has brought East and West Cameroon
together. This singularity should be manifested by the preservation of the two
distinct official cultural heritages of the concerned populations.
More importantly perhaps,
political promises and commitments made in the 1960’s and 1970’s ought to be
kept today with more rigour. Contrary to the belief often expressed by many
Cameroonians, I am absolutely convinced that politicians who last long in that
capacity are those who are committed to truth telling.
Today it is my
belief that the issue of federalism ought no longer to be considered as a taboo
subject, in as much as it is gaining ground in the minds and hearts of a
growing number of Cameroonians, as a realistic solution to our common present
crisis.
As a staunch
Pan-Africanist however, it stands to reason that I do not support any move that
advocates secession in Cameroon or anywhere else in Africa. The truth is that I
have personally been to Eritrea twice and to South Sudan and North Sudan three
times. I can therefore rely on what I saw.
Having sketched my
positions concerning these aspects of the “Anglophone crisis” – for lack of a
better term, – since I believe that all Cameroonians are affected by this
situation one way or the other, I would now like to focus on a related topic
which seems equally relevant: the place and the importance of school in the
dynamics of nation- building and the role truthful dialogue can play to
consolidate our national unity.
 |
| Prof Jean Emmanuel Pondi |
School as
a major tool for popular emancipation and nation building.
A quick glance
into the rear view mirror of the recent history of the battle for human
emancipation informs us that, as a general rule, the disadvantaged populations
always tends to mobilize themselves for a fight in their collective
determination to secure a better access to education, and not the way around.
In the United
States of America for instance, the landmark decision of the US Supreme Court
known as Brown vs Board of Education (of Topeka in the state of Kansas),
rendered on 17th of May 1954, overruled another previous US Supreme Court
decision known to legal experts as Plessy vs Ferguson of 1896, which upheld, as
valid, the application of racial discrimination in the state of Louisiana.
Standing at
opposite ends to that infamous 1896 US Supreme Court ruling, the 1954 decision
(also recorded as decision n°347 US 483) officially declared the practice of
racial segregation in all Kansas schools, as totally unconstitutional. The US
Supreme Court decision Bolling vs Sharpe extended this prescription to the
entire country in 1955. By so doing, the new ruling opened the road to updated
knowledge, critical thinking and to the socio-economic insertion of the “Black
Americans” into the American Dream. From the “Brain power” acquired in schools,
they were indeed able to conquer their full-fledged civil rights in 1964 and
1965. It equally seems important to strongly underline that these conquests
were in no way accomplished by politicians. They were the brain children of
civil rights leaders, hailing from all segments of the US civil society. But we
all know now with hindsight, that all of them were well-educated.
The second example
that could serve to illustrate the link between education, emancipation and
nation-building, comes from our own continent, in the then racist Republic of
South-Africa. On the 16th of June 1976, the apartheid regime of that country
attempted to forcefully impose the use of Afrikaans, the language spoken by a
portion of the white minority, in black schools, thereby restricting access to
universal education to a large number of English-speaking blacks who were
opposed to such an act of blatant discrimination within an already
discriminatory socio-political and cultural system.
A very strong
popular resistance to that cynical stratagem brought no less than 20 000 young
students and pupils on the street of the South West Township (SOWETO) of the
city of Johannesburg on the dreadful fatal day already mentioned above. Firing
real bullets, the police is reported to have killed between120 and 700 pupils
who were crusading for complete access to quality education for all South
Africans, regardless of race, creed or colour. Here again, the SOWETO riots
were the defining factor and moment that would finally lead to the advent of
full democracy in the “Rainbow Nation”, only eighteen years later, in 1994.
Why? Because the students of SOWETO who were only aged 10 at the time of the
riots, were 28 when South Africa succeeded to achieve its dream of full
universal voting rights for all its citizens, in April 1994. The type of
population was in a position to achieve such an outcome, was as an organized
group, that had been gradually better educated and, as such, could fight for
their own rights.
Another indicator
could be used to assess the importance of school in the emancipation process of
a people: the educational and professional backgrounds of those who led the
colonized territories of Africa towards independence and early nation building
in the 1960’s and 1970’s: most of them belonged to the teaching profession.
An
Examination of the educational and professional backgrounds of most fathers of
African independences: the clear predominance of school teachers
When one takes the
trouble to quickly investigate the educational and early professional profile
of many of the very African leaders who led their peoples to independence, one
is surely stuck by one undeniable fact: An impressive majority of them were
school teachers. A few were trade unionists or full-fledged politicians.
Four
examples will suffice to illustrate this assertion:
– Julius
K. NYERERE (1922-1999), the former President of Tanzania was also very widely
known as “Mwalimu” which in Swhahili, means “Teacher”. He had been a devoted
high school teacher for a long time before entering politics.
– Milton OBOTE (1924-2005), the former Head of State of
Uganda also used the chalk as a secondary school teacher prior to becoming
President of his country twice (1962-1971 and 1979-1985).
– Dr KWAME NKRUMAH, (1909-1972) The Pan-Africanist
President of Ghana, had acquired all the qualifications to become a University
don before being absorbed by politics.
– Closer to us, John NGU FONCHA (1916-1999):
the former Prime Minister and Vice-President of Cameroon, is remembered by so
many of his compatriots for having taught for a long time in Bamenda schools in
the 1930’s.
– Salomon TANDENG MUNA (1912-2002), former
Prime Minister and Speaker of the National Assembly of Cameroon. Prior to
entering the field of politics, he assumed the responsibility of Head of
several Primary schools between 1932 and 1947, before becoming Head Tutor of
Batibo Teachers Training College between 1947 and 1951.
The common link in
the lives of all these illustrious African personalities is that they were
first illuminated by the light of knowledge brought to them by their
traditional and modern schooling, before illuminating the path of the many
succeeding generations that had been placed under their responsibility. Indeed,
the uplifting socio-economic role of school could not have been more evident
than in the light of their individual and collective subsequent careers.
An argument which
is often heard from those who support the “school boycott approach” is that
“there is no need for children to go to school since schooling in this system
offers no guarantee for a stable and bright future”. This academic system,
according to them, offers no access to employment.
Though the overall
assessment of “poor quality education” is by and large accurate – an issue
which I have alluded to in many of my publications – depriving students and
pupils from school will lead to producing an illiterate, dangerous, violent and
disgruntled future society.
The “school
boycott approach”, such a reasoning is all the more surprising that a sizable
majority of the current Anglophones leaders, including the most critical of its
current functioning, went through this educational system. The training they
received in this “mediocre” system allowed them to succeed in life in Cameroon
and even more so abroad. What follows from all of the above, is the certainty
that democracy allows all citizens to choose the path they deem best for
themselves, so as to achieve the goals which they hold dear to their own
hearts. It is of extreme importance however, to realize that a problem which
has been lingering for the past 40 years cannot be resolved in the space of
only one year.
The
Necessity for Constructive Dialogue: In Search of Bridge-builders and Bridges
in the current Cameroonian Landscape.
When “the
Anglophone crisis” erupted, one observation became surprisingly glaring. The
absence of a sizable number of devoted and enthusiastic grassroots groups of
people, willing to defend the cause of peaceful coexistence in both cultural
entities. Neither the Francophones nor the Anglophones took it upon themselves,
as organised civil society groups, to consolidate national unity.
This is hardly
surprising. Not much in our school curricula teach English-speaking pupils and
students anything of deep value on French-speaking Cameroon and vice-versa. As
a consequence, the two communities have grown apart culturally and continue to
do so even when living in close physical proximity. In truth, most Francophones
do not know much about Anglophones and the reverse is unfortunately absolutely
true. Hence, the big boulevard for misunderstandings, rumour-mongering, and the
flourishing of mutual negative prejudices.
Crises should be
perceived as momentous times for creating a new political order accountable to
the real needs of the people. The time for dialogue is now. Who should be the
actors in this necessary dynamics of bridge-building? The communities that can
understand and fit into both cultural backgrounds (through marriage,
educational training, peace building, etc.).
But dialogue is
more effective when conducted amongst two rational sides, ready to discuss in a
peaceful and open manner. Fruitful dialogue also requires at least two major
ingredients: humility from all actors and trustworthiness as a general
principle. It is to be feared that none of the above is for the moment is
clearly detectable in the current context. It appears as though the process
leading to peaceful dialogue has been hijacked by hard-headed people on both
sides of the debate. All parties concerned should stand away from their
certainties and engage in a genuine listening process aimed at really
understanding each other’s viewpoint. Once this is done, real dialogue can take
place.
In conclusion, it
seems important to highlight at least one major point in the midst of many
others: refraining from going to school or from sending one’s children to
school cannot be considered as a rational solution for a people whose
legitimate ambition is to transform their societies into communities whose
members are fully equipped to meet the challenges of the 21st Century in the
context of a knowledge-based economy.
In this light,
more than ever before, there is a strong need for our educational system to
train pupils and students able to become productive, self-reliant, efficient
and proud citizens who know their country and their continent. Failure to do so
could lead to disastrous consequences.
The current crisis
is not only an Anglophone problem. It is the concern of all Cameroonians of
good faith. For when violence persists in a given society, you can rest assured
that it is a manifestation of an unresolved conflict.
Professor
Jean-Emmanuel PONDI
International
Relations Institute of Cameroon (IRIC)
